QueeringxMaking: Difference between revisions
Tag: Manual revert |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
X | X | ||
queering (x) making aspires to situate and communize the concept of (critical) | queering (x) making aspires to situate and communize the concept of <mark class="c5">(critical) making</mark>, through focusing on social and cultural urgencies that exceed (merely) material practices. It puts <mark class="c5">(critical) making</mark> into different contexts/realities, introducing it to diverse non-normative/vulnerable social groups and individuals. Through creating messy (and sticky) relations between conditions, (co-)creation, <mark class="c3">criticality</mark>, context and constituents, it discloses and dismantles both the underlying ‘productive’ norms and norm-ing of mainstream cultural and societal fabrications, as well as those of relatively privileged (academic and artistic) production. It instigates, informs, and inspires interventions by those who are (in most cases) denied access to means of production, overlooked in calculations of consumption, and excluded from long-term reflections and imaginations of <mark class="c7">diy</mark>. | ||
[[File:rainbow2.jpg|thumb]] | [[File:rainbow2.jpg|thumb]] | ||
[[File:rainbow3.jpg|thumb|PopUp RAINBOW making workshops and action of ToolsForAction and QueerSport with Green Action LGBTIQ activists in MaMa club (Zagreb), LGBT Centre (Split) and multiple locations (Vis) 2014]] | [[File:rainbow3.jpg|thumb|PopUp RAINBOW making workshops and action of ToolsForAction and QueerSport with Green Action LGBTIQ activists in MaMa club (Zagreb), LGBT Centre (Split) and multiple locations (Vis) 2014]] |
Revision as of 14:38, 21 March 2022
queering x making
X
queering (x) making aspires to situate and communize the concept of (critical) making, through focusing on social and cultural urgencies that exceed (merely) material practices. It puts (critical) making into different contexts/realities, introducing it to diverse non-normative/vulnerable social groups and individuals. Through creating messy (and sticky) relations between conditions, (co-)creation, criticality, context and constituents, it discloses and dismantles both the underlying ‘productive’ norms and norm-ing of mainstream cultural and societal fabrications, as well as those of relatively privileged (academic and artistic) production. It instigates, informs, and inspires interventions by those who are (in most cases) denied access to means of production, overlooked in calculations of consumption, and excluded from long-term reflections and imaginations of diy.