IMPAKT Hybrid Principles: Difference between revisions
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Click through to see what we mean by each term, and to browse how we implemented each one in related event case studies.  | Click through to see what we mean by each term, and to browse how we implemented each one in related event case studies.  | ||
# Keep it simple  | # Keep it simple  | ||
| Line 20: | Line 18: | ||
# Contextualise  | # Contextualise  | ||
# Consider Fair Tech  | # Consider Fair Tech  | ||
Note: If you are looking for hands-on practical advice we have developed from past experience check out our [[Tips & Tools]] page.  | |||
Revision as of 12:49, 25 March 2023
Hypotheses: Our Starting Point
Hypotheses we had starting these projects:
Online audiences are too often given a second-class ticket to the events they attend. At IMPAKT our aim has been to develop tools that create an equally high quality event for both in-venue and online guests.
It is easy to overlook how alienated an online guest can feel in a hybrid event. We have found that the biggest challenge is to create environments with a low threshold for online participation.
Over the past year we have been testing different strategies to blend these audiences and curate experiences that make the best of both in-person and digital environments. We took the following 9 principles as a framework to test different strategies and tools.
Click through to see what we mean by each term, and to browse how we implemented each one in related event case studies.
- Keep it simple
 - Make it participatory
 - Cultivate collectivity
 - Create an atmosphere
 - Mimic the familiar
 - Contextualise
 - Consider Fair Tech
 
Note: If you are looking for hands-on practical advice we have developed from past experience check out our Tips & Tools page.